Clinical patterns

Acknowledge & escalate

The full lifecycle of an alarm, from the moment it fires to the moment it is permanently resolved — including every way it can be silenced, and the ways it must not be.

Stable · v1.0 Pattern IEC 60601-1-8 Alarm fatigue AcuteLine

Overview

The Alert Banner specifies what an alarm looks like. This pattern specifies what it does over time: how it is acknowledged, when it comes back, when it escalates to someone else, and how it ends.

That lifecycle is where alarm safety is actually won or lost. Two failure modes sit at opposite ends and both are lethal: an alarm that nags until clinicians ignore the whole class, and an alarm that goes quiet while the patient is still deteriorating.

Answerable

Every alarm can be acknowledged in one action, from wherever it is seen. An alarm a clinician cannot answer is an alarm they learn to tune out.

Never silently ending

An alarm leaves the screen for exactly two reasons: a clinician answered it, or the condition resolved and that resolution was shown. Nothing else.

Escalating on evidence

Time alone escalates to a person. New clinical evidence escalates the alarm itself. The two are different mechanisms and are never conflated.

The lifecycle

Alarm state machine
Active → Acknowledged (timed) → Re-asserted timer lapses, condition persists
Active → Acknowledged (indefinite) → Resolved condition clears
Active → Latched → Resolved condition cleared before anyone saw it
Any state → Escalated no response within the escalation window
StateVisualAudioExits to
ActiveFull priority chromaPriority tone Acknowledged, Resolved, Escalated
Acknowledged (timed) Chroma drops to rail; countdown visibleSilent Re-asserted, Resolved
Acknowledged (indefinite) Chroma drops to railSilentResolved, Escalated on new evidence
Re-assertedFull chroma returnsPriority tone returns Acknowledged, Resolved, Escalated
LatchedFull chroma retainedSilent after first cycle Resolved once acknowledged
EscalatedFull chroma; recipient namedPriority tone Acknowledged by the escalation recipient
ResolvedRemoved or replaced by confirmationSilent Terminal — persists in the event log

Acknowledging

Acknowledgement means "a qualified person has seen this." It does not mean the problem is solved, and the interface must never let those two blur.

The lifecycle, operable — try pausing the audio
STEMI pattern detected — anterior leads V2–V4
Unacknowledged
AcuteLine v4.2 · detected 14:26:41 · Bed 7, R. Halvorsen

    Pause the audio and read the state line. The alarm is quieter and it is still unanswered — the two are different facts and the interface refuses to conflate them. Acknowledging does not end the alarm either: it latches until the condition resolves, which is why acknowledging and escalating both leave it active.

    ModeWindowUseAvailable at
    TimedDocumented per alarm class; 10 min default for CriticalDefault for Critical — the clinician is acting, not dismissing Critical, Urgent
    IndefiniteUntil the condition resolves The clinician has assessed and a plan is in place Urgent, Advisory
    Audio pauseFixed, documented, non-extendable Managing noise during a procedure or conversation All — visual signal unaffected
    Audio pause is not acknowledgement

    Pausing audio silences the tone and changes nothing else. The banner keeps full chroma, the alarm keeps its state, and a separate indicator shows audio is paused with the time remaining. Pause is time-boxed, cannot be extended indefinitely, and never applies to a class of alarms — only the one in front of the clinician.

    Do
    STEMI pattern detected — anterior V2–V4
    audio paused 01:47 · alarm still active

    Audio off, visual signal at full strength, remaining pause stated.

    Don't
    Alarms muted
    Sound is off for this session.

    A global, open-ended mute that also drains the visual signal. The patient is still having a STEMI and the screen no longer says so.

    Escalating

    Two mechanisms, deliberately separate:

    Time-based — escalates to a person

    The alarm has not been answered within its window. The finding has not changed; the audience has. The alarm names who it has gone to, so the original recipient knows help is coming and the new recipient knows why they were called.

    Unanswered — escalated to a second recipient

    Evidence-based — escalates the alarm

    New data has changed the clinical picture. This is the only mechanism permitted to re-raise an alarm a clinician has already assessed, and it must state what changed. See Clinician override.

    What must never happen

    NeverWhy
    Auto-dismiss on a timer An alarm that disappears unseen is indistinguishable from one that never fired.
    Dismiss on navigation or page change Moving to another screen is not an assessment.
    Bulk "acknowledge all" Guarantees at least one alarm is answered without being read.
    Acknowledge from a notification the alarm text is not fully visible in Answering something you have not read is not acknowledgement.
    Silence a whole alarm class or an entire session Removes the signal for patients nobody has assessed.
    Escalate on the same evidence, repeatedly Nagging. Trains clinicians to dismiss the class without reading.
    Let a clinician disable an alarm class from within a clinical screen Alarm configuration is an administrative act with its own authority and audit.
    "Acknowledge all" is a hazard, not a convenience

    Every request for a bulk-acknowledge control is really a report that the system is over-alerting. The correct response is to fix the alarm burden — tune thresholds, coalesce duplicates, demote inflated priorities — never to add a control whose purpose is to answer alarms without reading them. Coalescing identical findings on the same patient is permitted and is a different mechanism entirely.

    Alarm burden

    Alarm fatigue is a system property, not a user failing. A product built on this system is expected to measure and publish its own burden.

    This page owns raised alarms

    Everything here concerns an alarm that fired. Software that reduces burden by deciding some alarms should never fire at all is making a different decision, with a different failure mode — one that announces itself to nobody. That is designed in Suppression & the unraised alarm, which starts from the position argued here and asks how the silence is held to account.

    Who holds each rule

    Most of what makes acknowledgement safe is timing, and timing lives in the alarm system, not in anything that renders. The component holds the shape of an acknowledgement; the implementer holds its consequences.

    RuleHeld by Where
    No auto-dismiss, everAlert banner An alarm condition renders with no dismiss control at all. Acknowledging is the only action, and it is not the same thing.
    Asserted: AlertBanner: there is no dismiss control at any priority
    Acknowledgement records who and whenAlert banner acknowledgedBy takes a name and a time and renders both, and the control disappears once used.
    Asserted: AlertBanner: acknowledged state names the person, and the control goes
    State change is announcedAlert banner A critical or urgent condition is an assertive live region; an advisory is polite.
    Asserted: AlertBanner: an alarm condition is an assertive live region
    Audio is never the sole channelAlert banner The visual signal always carries the priority in words. Audio is not emitted by this package at all, so it cannot be the sole channel here — see the rows below for what that leaves you.
    Asserted: AlertBanner: priority is in text, not only in colour
    Acknowledgement is terminal and persistsEvent log The record has no edit, delete or clear. An acknowledgement made in error is corrected by a later entry that says so, and both stand.
    Asserted: EventLog: no entry can be edited, removed or cleared
    Timed acknowledgement by default at CriticalThe implementer A timer. The banner has none; onAcknowledge tells you it happened and nothing here re-asserts.
    LatchingThe implementer Whether a condition that has cleared still needs acknowledging is alarm-system state the renderer does not hold.
    No bulk acknowledge, no class-wide silencingThe implementer Prohibited system-wide and expressible as an ordinary button. Nothing in the package can stop you writing one; the prohibition is in what is not accepted.
    Time escalation to a person; evidence escalation to the alarmThe implementer Routing logic. Which of those a given change of state triggers is a decision your alarm system makes.
    Unreachable escalation recipient is itself an alarmThe implementer Detecting that a page went unanswered, and raising a new condition because of it, is the alarm system's.
    A Critical alarm never escalates into nothingThe implementer The terminal recipient of an escalation chain is a deployment fact; the renderer cannot know whether one exists.
    Escalation never restarts the clock on the original alarmThe implementer Two timers, and the discipline of not resetting one when the other starts.
    Re-assertion does not steal focusThe implementer A re-asserted alarm is a new render of the banner. Whether your application moves focus to it is your routing; the banner does not.
    Countdowns are textThe implementer There is no countdown component here. If you build one, the rule is that it is announced as text at intervals, not as a spinning ring.
    Escalation windows are configured per deployment, not per userDeployment configuration Set once for the site, under the controls in Safety configuration.
    Burden is measured and publishedThe implementer Alarms per clinician per hour, time to acknowledge, acknowledge-without-open rate: none of these can be measured from inside a component. They are your telemetry.
    Why this is written down

    A pattern page has no component underneath it, so a rule stated here is held by whoever builds against it unless a component already holds it. Of these 16 rules, 5 are held by a component this package ships, 1 are deployment configuration, and 10 are the implementer’s. The three rules IEC 60601-1-8 actually turns on — re-assertion, escalation and rate — are all on the implementer’s side. This page renders acknowledgement correctly; it does not make an alarm system safe.

    Do's and don'ts

    Do
    STEMI pattern detected — anterior V2–V4
    audio paused 01:47 · alarm still active

    Audio off, visual signal at full strength, remaining pause stated.

    Don't
    Alarms muted
    Sound is off for this session.

    A global, open-ended mute that also drains the visual signal. The patient is still having a STEMI.

    Do
    ST elevation increased since your assessment — 3.1 → 4.8 mm
    Serial ECG at 15:04. You assessed this as early repolarisation at 14:31.

    Re-alerts on new evidence, and says what changed.

    Don't
    STEMI pattern detected — anterior V2–V4
    re-alert 4 of 11 · same recording

    The same finding on the same recording, fired eleven times. This is how a clinician learns to dismiss red.

    Accessibility

    Outcomes of use

    What this contributes to, in the terms of Usability & context of use. These are attributes believed to contribute to an outcome; the outcome itself is settled by observing real use in a specified context, not by this page.

    Clinical safety notes

    Risk controls this pattern specifies, and what checks each

    Trace these in your risk file (ISO 14971) and usability engineering file (IEC 62366-1). Each bullet says what checks it: a component that holds the rule, a test in your verification file, deployment configuration, post-market surveillance, or a design review where no test can see it. A control checked by nothing is a sentence.

    NotJustAnyMed.Tech Design System · Acknowledge & escalate · v1.0 · draft for review
    Reference applications named in this system are fictional; all patient data shown is fabricated.